The sapir whorf thesis

For example there is an experiment from BBC 'Do you see what I see' that could reject critics concern. A person from BBC went to the tribe, Himba. The western experimenter showed 12 colors which only one color is different. The western person have shown 11 colors of -188-12(red,green,blue), and another color of -188-2(red,green,blue). Both colors seem 'green' and it is pretty hard to recognize the difference of us; nevertheless, the Himba recognize them without hesitation. In another experiment, the western person has shown 11 colors -95-65 and one color of -95-110. To the western, the two colors is

Richard Webster , writing in Why Freud Was Wrong (1995), concludes that Pinker argues cogently that the human capacity for language is part of the genetic endowment associated with the evolution through natural selection of specialised neural networks within the brain, and that its attack on the ' standard social science model ' of human nature is effective. Webster accepts Pinker's argument that, for ideological motives, twentieth-century social scientists have minimized the extent to which human nature is influenced by genetics. However, Webster finds Pinker's speculation about other specialized neural networks that may have evolved within the human brain—such as "intuitive mechanics" and "intuitive biology"—to be questionable, and believes that there is a danger that they will be treated by others as science. Webster believes that such speculations strengthen supporters of extreme genetic determinism. [2]

The sapir whorf thesis

the sapir whorf thesis


the sapir whorf thesisthe sapir whorf thesisthe sapir whorf thesisthe sapir whorf thesis